Person-first language
National Institute on Drug Abuse: Words Matter
NIDA recommends person-first language and explains how stigmatizing terms can create negative bias and barriers to care.
Open official source ↗Evidence & sources
Brave Harbor’s public language and scope are guided by recognized sources on stigma, multiple pathways, peer support, crisis response, and medical safety.
Person-first language
NIDA recommends person-first language and explains how stigmatizing terms can create negative bias and barriers to care.
Open official source ↗Multiple pathways
SAMHSA describes recovery as highly personal and recognizes many pathways, including treatment, medication, peer support, family support, faith-based approaches, and self-care.
Open official source ↗Medical safety
NIAAA warns that sudden alcohol withdrawal after prolonged heavy drinking can be potentially life-threatening and may require medical help.
Open official source ↗Crisis support
The crisis-support cards link to information based on ASSMCA Línea PAS, the U.S. 988 Lifeline, Canada’s 9-8-8, Samaritans, and Lifeline Australia.
Meditation & mindfulness
NCCIH summarizes evidence on meditation and mindfulness for stress, anxiety, sleep, and substance-use disorders, while also noting that some participants report negative experiences during practice.
Open official source ↗Brave Harbor practice framework
Mindful Navigation is presented as a secular, optional skills practice. Brave Harbor uses brief grounding, present-moment awareness, urge observation, thought labeling, and body awareness while avoiding cure claims or spiritual requirements.
See Mindful Navigation →Acceptance & Commitment Therapy · Addiction research
Across 28 studies (22 pooled), ACT interventions had higher abstinence rates at the end of treatment and at short-term follow-up than active comparison interventions. A long-term advantage was not established. These results concern studied interventions, not Brave Harbor's peer-support exercise.
Read peer-reviewed research ↗ACT · Comparative effectiveness
Reviewing 34 randomized trials of full-model ACT against established psychotherapies, investigators found no overall superiority for ACT on mental or behavioral health outcomes. They noted methodological weaknesses and called for stronger trials.
Read PubMed study ↗ACT · Research overview
This overview describes plausible evidence for ACT across several conditions, including substance use disorders, while emphasizing that the strength of evidence varies by application. Psychological flexibility is a central proposed mechanism.
Read PubMed review ↗ACT · Earlier substance-use evidence
Ten randomized trials suggested a small-to-medium benefit of ACT compared with active treatments for substance-use abstinence. The authors described ACT as promising, but the review was preliminary and individual trials were often small.
Read PubMed study ↗How Brave Harbor uses ACT research
The members-only CORE exercise “The Helm & The Storm” adapts acceptance, thought distancing, values and committed-action principles for voluntary peer reflection. It has not itself been clinically tested. Brave Harbor does not claim that this exercise treats addiction or outperforms professional care.
About Guided membership →Important distinction
Brave Harbor may teach general educational skills that overlap with clinical approaches. A peer Navigator is not providing CBT, DBT, ACT, motivational interviewing, trauma treatment, or another psychotherapy unless that person is independently licensed and the service is explicitly offered under a separate clinical structure.
Participants should consult qualified professionals for diagnosis, individualized treatment, medication, medical risk, trauma treatment, or complex mental-health concerns.